Technoutopic Forest Dreams
the opposite of an echo
Drawing from the research on this project, I have created a triptych of web-based artworks about trees, growth, hope,
community and collaboration. These are linked in the images below. All of the photographs have been
taken on-site at Kielderhead Wildwood Project, Kielder, UK during a residency in April 2021.
the opposite of an echo
child of a shout
allacam
Part of the process in this project is trying to engage an alternate online community, outside of
those represented by the mono-culture of centralised online platforms.
To this end, I have contacted many of the activists and engaged people on my 'community' list, and
here I document some of the interactions I have had.
Note: The Fediverse is a collection of
online, open source platforms for social interaction that operate outside the mainsteam platforms like Google or
Facebook. Most of the platforms that I explore here are part of the Fediverse.
Note 2: I am absolutely not a supporter of technological utopia, but do believe that there are good
ideas in technology, and want to explore these toward a better, and more mutually connected
future. This includes ad-hoc, community led networks, and online platforms for sharing and information.
Socratic Dialogue, Mastodon
Using the online platform Mastodon, I carried out a
Socratic Dialogue about the strengths and weaknesses of peer-controlled social networks.
The following link shows the full conversation, including a range of participants from
different backgrounds: view here.
The Socratic Dialogue asked the question: "How to avoid an echo chamber...Is there a danger of exclusivity?",
referring to the peer-controlled networks of the Fediverse.
The answers spawned the following list of results from the continued questioning:
- 1) Scale may be important: A smaller platform is potentially easier to manage
- 2) Rate of increase of scale is also important: If something scales too quickly then there might not be enough time for people to learn the etiquette and rules of a platform
- 3) Moderation is key. Moderators weed out debate that does not follow the rules or etiquette, and people self-regulate their streams
- 4) Distribution of power is a factor (linked to moderation) that allows for this self-regulation
- 5) One public sphere might not be enough – it might require many public spheres and many people interacting in different areas to create clear ideas
- 6) Online debate may provide a platform, but does not guarantee follow through. Real life interactions with people are needed to create positive social change
I have built a blog on Pleroma, and a connected server, using Raspberry Pi and following this guide. This
will be used later in the project, when I begin documenting the development of the interactive
artworks once I arrive at Kielder.
I have ongoing profiles on Mastodon, PeerTube, Scuttlebutt and Diaspora; the latter has been active since 2013.
I work with open source technologies, including Raspberry Pi and Arduino, and will use these in later parts
of this project/